Can We Disincentivize Extreme Polarization w Nathan Smolensky | Politics with Paul #106

In this episode of Politics with Paul, Paul Rader chats with Nathan Smolensky about tackling political polarization. Nathan delves into the allure of division and how incentives shape political behavior. They discuss why polarized people often don't recognize their own divisiveness, balancing short-term wins with long-term goals, and crafting unique moral incentives. The media's role in fostering polarization and the potential influence of independent candidates are also explored. The episode wraps up with ways to engage non-polarized voters and a fun debate on pronouncing "coupon."

Speakers

AI Chat

Paul Rader

Host • 52%

Nathan Smolensky

Guest • 48%

Chapters

0:00	Introduction and Guest Background
1:42	Why Nathan is Involved with Disincentivizing Polarization
3:22	Is it Inherently Selfish to Act on Incentive?
6:34	Why it's Tantalizing for Anybody to Be Polarizing
9:01	Are Those Who Think Division is a One-Side Problem Self-Aware?
11:44	Too Much Focus on Short-Term Victories Over Long-Term Sustainability?
17:52	Do We Need a Unique Approach Toward Moral Incentives?
23:45	Disincentivizing the Media From Promoting Polarizing Content
27:40	Does Depolarization Require More Independents Winning Elections?
33:21	Do Bridge-Builders Focus Too Often on Moral Arguments for Depolarization?
36:37	On Convincing Non-Polarized Voters to Participate More in Politics
41:14	Final Thoughts on Disincentivizing Polarization and Toxicity
42:55	Nathan's Article "You Have to Burn the Rope"
45:06	Random Question: Is Coupon Pronounced "Coo-pon" or "Cue-pon"?
48:13	Closing and Our Show Notes

Transcript

Clip

Loading transcript...