The US Senate: Abolish, Keep the Same, or Reform? | Politics with Paul #109
The US Senate often finds itself in the middle of controversy and as the subject of scorn. But does this mean we should eliminate it completely? Is it outdated ... or still a necessary part of American government? In today's episode of Politics with Paul, we tackle this question. While it's not a popular view, at its core are some of the most essential questions about how our government should work. The episode also covers why we need to know why the US Senate was created, the question of whether it is an extreme position, and potential changes to the US Senate including a lower threshold to override filibusters or slight changes to the number of Senators per state.
Key Points
- The US Senate was established to balance the power between larger and smaller states and to create a more deliberative legislative body.
- Arguments for abolishing the Senate often cite its undemocratic nature, as each state gets equal representation regardless of population size, which can skew the democratic principle of "one person, one vote."
- Reforming the Senate, such as adjusting the filibuster rules or altering the number of senators per state, could address some criticisms without eliminating the institution entirely.
Other Works
- FREE 5-day educational email course on how to fight polarization: https://detoxifyamericanpolitics.com/
- Buy my book about political independents: https://www.amazon.com/Why-Independents-Rarely-Win-Elections-ebook/dp/B09K8PYM5J/
- Medium articles on elections and political science: https://paulrader-42650.medium.com/
Media
- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/paulrader352/
- My website: https://paulrader.org/
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PaulRaderWrites
- Email: [email protected]
Chapters
| 0:00 | |
| 2:00 | |
| 7:50 | |
| 10:39 | |
| 14:12 | |
| 16:40 | |
| 18:32 | |
| 21:48 | |
| 25:37 | |
| 31:46 | |
| 40:37 |
Transcript
Loading transcript...
- / -


